[Posthumanism lecture] Rights of Nature - law as if life mattered

By Rose Sohee - 3월 12, 2019


[Posthumanism lecture] Rights of Nature

- law as if life mattered


in DOMA



  Pella Thiel

  Pella Thiel works with relational, systemic activism, change processes and leadership för a society in harmony with nature.
She is a co-founder and board member of the Swedish Transition Network, End Ecocide Sweden, Save the Rainforest Sweden and the swedish Network for Rights of Nature . She coordinated the first two Rights of Nature Conferences in Sweden. She has edited two books on nature interpretation and is currently working on a book on rights of nature. Pella has an MSc in Ecology from Stockholm University with the thesis on rainforest restoration in Ecuador. She enjoys pigs, her greenhouse (which has been under construction for four years) and having her hands in the soil at the smallholding in the archipelago of Stockholm where she lives. She is part of the eco-psychology/activist NGO Lodyn, U N Harmony with Nature initiative and the Common cause international network. 



  Thomas - "NEW Narrative and NEW approach to sea life."




  The idea that nature has rights what does it stir in me?

Ambiguous about the range of the term, 'nature'. If I am heard 'Animals have a right', it is familiar for me. 


We live in the Holocene and move to the Anthropocene. 



 Rivers are changing because of people. Lake Erie in Ohio and Ganja in India are severely polluted. What if water is essential for human polluted, what it will happen to human? If we want to talk about the water, we should also talk about the lake and river. We need to think that rivers and lakes have a right. 


 "We've been using the same laws for decades to try and protect Lake Erie. They're clearly not working. Beginning today, with this historic vote, the people of Toledo and our allies are ushering in a new era of environmental rights by securing the rights of the Great Lake Erie."

- Markie


We abuse land because we see it as a commodity belonging to us.
 - Aldo Leopold, 1949


In our culture and society, nature is an object. Why we think like that?
It's because of an assumption.


From a long time ago, Western society believed that human can dominate nature. Moreover, the human had thought men only have a soul. Women may have a soul but women are closer to nature. However, science changed our whole premises. Now the anthropocentric assumption should be changed. 



Should Trees Have Standing? (1972)

The fact is, that each time there is a movement to confer rights onto some new "entity", the proposal is.....
- fdklsjflkdsajfl;dja

Killing a slave was not a crime a long time ago, because he didn't have a right. However, we think the slave system is horrible. However, I think we still have nature as a slave. 



What right nature has? 
First, to survive in the original area. 




Hence nature can be changed from object to a subject having rights.




What becomes possible when Rights of Nature are acknowledged?



What I believe is that the art is important for democracy. The literature gave rights to children, and disability people

  • Share:

You Might Also Like

0 개의 댓글